This week, the cryptocurrency underperformed as a haven for the economy. However, bitcoiners are looking farther ahead.
Stay in the know on crypto by frequently visiting Crypto News Today
Oh no, it’s happening again: The question of whether bitcoin (BTC) is a hedge is once again up for debate.
The talks started on Saturday, following the cryptocurrency’s nearly 10% decline, from approximately $70,000 to less than $62,000, in response to Iran’s abortive missile attack on Gaza. A few columns were sparked by the move on Monday, including one from Fortune’s Jeff John Roberts, which contextualized the move in light of gold’s 17% surge, and another from Blockwork’s Casey Wagner, which examined the movement of gas prices in response to Middle Eastern crises.
CryptoCaster Quick Check:
It’s true that after the attack, there were more buyers than sellers of gold and oil, and more sellers than buyers of bitcoin; as a result, the value of the former increased while the latter decreased. However, I’ve always believed that, for an asset as volatile as bitcoin, intraday price movements reveal very little. The bad news is that, although bitcoin saw a brief spike on Sunday, it has been steadily declining this week, reaching lows in the $60K range. Meanwhile, gold is still rising, much like it did following the failure of Lehman Brothers.
Bitcoin may be suffering from the impending threat of World War I, but the market is probably reacting to signals from the Fed that they may keep interest rates higher for longer than they had planned because the economy is doing well. However, it seems inappropriate to question whether bitcoin is a hedge given that it has been acting more and more like a tech stock in recent years.
Bitcoin can obviously function as a countercyclical asset because, prior to the pandemic, it was largely uncorrelated with the S&P 500. What has changed between then and now is the question. What precisely is bitcoin meant to hedge, by the way? Equities? A rise in prices? US Treasury Bonds? Unrest in politics? Is bitcoin designed to be a universally accessible financial safe haven?
The quantity of bitcoin in circulation, the number of holders, and whales are probably some of the factors at work. However, the solution is rather obvious in that bitcoin has become institutionalized. During the time of the January launch of spot bitcoin ETFs, Barron’s reported:
Since its inception more than ten years ago, Bitcoin’s volatility has continued to steadily decrease. Since the launch of bitcoin futures, which mirror the price of the spot token, volatility, as determined by the 100-day average of daily price swings in percentage points, hasn’t surpassed 4.5%, according to Bauer. That metric hasn’t gone above 3.5% since the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF, a bitcoin futures fund, launched in 2021. The volatility over the last year has remained below 2.6%.
Although volatility isn’t everything—and it still varies significantly from traditional equities—it is a distinguishing characteristic of the asset, at least as it was previously understood to be. Did anyone really believe that bitcoin would never stop fluctuating? As liquidity and scale grow, volatility resulting from small, idiosyncratic events diminishes in any market that is expanding from new to mainstream, according to Austin Campbell, assistant professor at Columbia Business School.
This trend might pick up speed with the introduction of spot bitcoin ETFs, some of which have grown the fastest among financial products this year. The relationship between bitcoin and stocks may get closer as entry barriers disappear and the cryptocurrency gains traction. The S&P is bought by the same individuals and fund managers who are currently purchasing bitcoin; investor psychology is blending.
Actually, the entire premise behind “hyperbitcoinization” is that as more people use bitcoin, its price volatility will decrease and it may become a practical medium of exchange. The problem with this idea is that it was based on the assumption that the fiat system would collapse as a widespread, circular bitcoin economy grew. Put another way, it was anticipated that bitcoin would become more uncorrelated and less volatile. That was the hedge for bitcoin.
This could have its roots in the widespread misconception that bitcoin is “digital gold.” However, it’s a flawed metaphor—good in that a connection to gold suggested that Bitcoin might have value, but bad in that it created false expectations at a time when nobody really knew how Bitcoin would behave.
We have a jumble of concepts about bitcoin today—it’sa hedge, a store of value, a payment method, a beta trade, a wager against fiat, and, more and more, a development platform—probably because digital gold became the standard description. While everyone wants bitcoin to be everything at once, over the past fifteen years, it has essentially excelled at just one thing: absorbing excess liquidity.
We largely don’t know how bitcoin will fare in the event of a crisis. “Unprecedented levels of monetary easing by central banks across the world since 2008/09 have increased money supply to record levels,” S&P analysts wrote in a 2023 report about macroeconomic impacts on cryptocurrency, implying that the money supply increased and that bitcoin grew as a result.
At present, bitcoin may simply flow the crowd, increasing when the economy expands and declining when it contracts. However, the real hedge that Bitcoin enthusiasts anticipate is more of a sudden surge.
We hope you found this article insightful. Before you go, please consider supporting CryptoCaster’s independent journalism.
In the world of media owned by billionaires like Elon Musk, Larry Fink (BlackRock), and Jamie Dimon (JP Morgan Chase), influence over narratives surrounding cryptocurrency and Web3 often reflects their interests. CryptoCaster is different. With no billionaire backers or shareholder obligations, we are committed solely to public interest journalism, covering crypto advancements and institutional changes without profit-driven motives.
Unlike much of mainstream media, which can fall into neutrality traps that obscure the real impacts on retail investors, we’re guided by transparency and integrity. We are unafraid to take a stand in the ongoing struggle against fiat banking dominance and in support of the monetary innovation driven by crypto and Web3. Reporting on issues like FTX, Binance, and Ripple, we bring a bold, unfiltered outsider’s view on global financial disruption—free from the constraints of traditional media narratives.
CryptoCaster remains paywall-free, accessible to everyone, thanks to the support of readers like you. Your contributions keep us independent and help ensure that critical information on the crypto landscape reaches all. If you value our work, please consider supporting us with a one-time contribution starting at just $1 in Bitcoin or Ether, or even monthly if you’re able. Scroll down to find our wallet addresses and help keep CryptoCaster independent and thriving.
Thank you for your support,
Kristin Steinbeck
Editor, CryptoCaster
Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2024 Crypto Caster provides information. CryptoCaster.world does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.
Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Metamask or favorite wallet. Send Coin/Token to Addresses Provided Below.
Thank you!
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
CRYPTOCASTER HEATMAP
