- The federal court presiding over the SEC’s action against cryptocurrency firm DEBT Box has ordered the SEC to explain apparent “false or misleading” remarks made by the SEC’s lawyers while seeking for a restraining order against the company.
- The SEC’s lawyers face sanctions and have fourteen days to respond before Utah’s top federal judge, Judge Robert J. Shelby.
According to a new court filing, Utah’s top federal judge has ordered the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to explain claims made during its efforts to execute and maintain a temporary restraining order (TRO) against crypto company DEBT Box.
The TRO was lifted in October after Judge Robert J. Shelby, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Utah, ruled that several of the SEC’s arguments for the injunction were “false or misleading.”
The SEC claimed at the time that DEBT Box was actively moving assets overseas to avoid SEC jurisdiction, closing bank accounts in June 2023 to “move investor funds” overseas to the United Arab Emirates “for the express purpose of evading the federal securities laws.”
Shelby said in an additional comprehensive filing explaining his order that the SEC’s claim during a hearing on the TRO on July 28th that the defendants had closed 33 bank accounts in the previous 48 hours represented “the most significant evidence” that DEBT Box was attempting to shift funds overseas. That information, along with assertions from the SEC that the defendants were preventing investigators from viewing particular social media pages, convinced the judge to grant the TRO.
CryptoCaster Quick Check:
However, the defendants argued in a move to dissolve the TRO filed in September that no bank accounts were stopped in June or July 2023. Rather, the thirteen bank accounts closed by the defendants were all closed on or before January 20, 2023 – and nine of the accounts were closed by banks, not the defendants.
Stay in the know on crypto by frequently visiting Crypto News Today
“There was no evidence that any bank accounts were closed in the 48 hours preceding the ex parte hearing,” Shelby said in his submission.
Shelby also considered the SEC’s characterizations of the defendants’ comments to be misleading, and he questioned the SEC’s claim that the defendants were restricting investigators from visiting certain websites, given that the SEC described its inquiry as “covert.”
Sanctions that may be imposed
Judge Shelby stated that he is “…concerned that the Commission made materially false and misleading representations” in support of the TRO. Shleby also stated that the TRO was a “extraordinary relief” that resulted in the appointment of a Temporary Receiver who was given “full power over all funds, assets, collateral, premises…choices in action, books, records, papers, and other property belonging to” DEBT Box, its affiliates, and subsidiaries.
As a result, Shelby directed the SEC to argue why sanctions should not be placed on the Commission’s lawyers, and presented additional questions to the agency about the evidence it used to support its claims in court. Shelby noted that, for instance, “If the investigation had been covert, what factual support did counsel possess and rely on when representing Defendants had ‘taken action to block SEC investigative staff from viewing their social media sites?'”
Advertisement
Follow GappyCoin PreSale on Twitter, and ReCap for information and more.
The punishments, which Shelby specifies as “shall be limited to what is sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct,” may include monetary penalties, but may also be limited to “directives of a nonmonetary nature.” The agency’s response is due in fourteen days, according to Fortune, and a representative said, “We are in receipt of the order to show cause and will respond to the court as directed.”
If this article brought you clarity, insight, or value—support the work that made it possible.
At CryptoCaster, we report on Web3, crypto markets, and institutional finance with no billionaire owners, no shareholders, and no hidden agenda. While mainstream media bends toward Elon Musk, BlackRock, and JPMorgan narratives, we stay focused on what matters: truth, transparency, and the public interest.
We don’t just cover the headlines—we investigate the power structures behind them. From FTX and Ripple to the quiet push for CBDCs, we bring fearless reporting that isn’t filtered by corporate interests.
CryptoCaster is 100% paywall-free. Always has been. To keep it that way, we depend on readers like you.
If you believe independent crypto journalism matters, please contribute—starting at just $1 in Bitcoin or Ether. Wallet addresses are below.
Your support keeps us free, bold, and accountable to no one but you.
Thank you,
Kristin Steinbeck
Editor, CryptoCaster
Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2024 Crypto Caster provides information. CryptoCaster.world does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.
Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Metamask or favorite wallet. Send Coin/Token to Addresses Provided Below.
Thank you!
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
CRYPTOCASTER HEATMAP
