- The federal court presiding over the SEC’s action against cryptocurrency firm DEBT Box has ordered the SEC to explain apparent “false or misleading” remarks made by the SEC’s lawyers while seeking for a restraining order against the company.
- The SEC’s lawyers face sanctions and have fourteen days to respond before Utah’s top federal judge, Judge Robert J. Shelby.
According to a new court filing, Utah’s top federal judge has ordered the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to explain claims made during its efforts to execute and maintain a temporary restraining order (TRO) against crypto company DEBT Box.
The TRO was lifted in October after Judge Robert J. Shelby, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Utah, ruled that several of the SEC’s arguments for the injunction were “false or misleading.”
The SEC claimed at the time that DEBT Box was actively moving assets overseas to avoid SEC jurisdiction, closing bank accounts in June 2023 to “move investor funds” overseas to the United Arab Emirates “for the express purpose of evading the federal securities laws.”
Shelby said in an additional comprehensive filing explaining his order that the SEC’s claim during a hearing on the TRO on July 28th that the defendants had closed 33 bank accounts in the previous 48 hours represented “the most significant evidence” that DEBT Box was attempting to shift funds overseas. That information, along with assertions from the SEC that the defendants were preventing investigators from viewing particular social media pages, convinced the judge to grant the TRO.
CryptoCaster Quick Check:
However, the defendants argued in a move to dissolve the TRO filed in September that no bank accounts were stopped in June or July 2023. Rather, the thirteen bank accounts closed by the defendants were all closed on or before January 20, 2023 – and nine of the accounts were closed by banks, not the defendants.
Stay in the know on crypto by frequently visiting Crypto News Today
“There was no evidence that any bank accounts were closed in the 48 hours preceding the ex parte hearing,” Shelby said in his submission.
Shelby also considered the SEC’s characterizations of the defendants’ comments to be misleading, and he questioned the SEC’s claim that the defendants were restricting investigators from visiting certain websites, given that the SEC described its inquiry as “covert.”
Sanctions that may be imposed
Judge Shelby stated that he is “…concerned that the Commission made materially false and misleading representations” in support of the TRO. Shleby also stated that the TRO was a “extraordinary relief” that resulted in the appointment of a Temporary Receiver who was given “full power over all funds, assets, collateral, premises…choices in action, books, records, papers, and other property belonging to” DEBT Box, its affiliates, and subsidiaries.
As a result, Shelby directed the SEC to argue why sanctions should not be placed on the Commission’s lawyers, and presented additional questions to the agency about the evidence it used to support its claims in court. Shelby noted that, for instance, “If the investigation had been covert, what factual support did counsel possess and rely on when representing Defendants had ‘taken action to block SEC investigative staff from viewing their social media sites?'”
Advertisement
Follow GappyCoin PreSale on Twitter, and ReCap for information and more.
The punishments, which Shelby specifies as “shall be limited to what is sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct,” may include monetary penalties, but may also be limited to “directives of a nonmonetary nature.” The agency’s response is due in fourteen days, according to Fortune, and a representative said, “We are in receipt of the order to show cause and will respond to the court as directed.”
We hope you found this article insightful. Before you go, please consider supporting CryptoCaster’s independent journalism.
In the world of media owned by billionaires like Elon Musk, Larry Fink (BlackRock), and Jamie Dimon (JP Morgan Chase), influence over narratives surrounding cryptocurrency and Web3 often reflects their interests. CryptoCaster is different. With no billionaire backers or shareholder obligations, we are committed solely to public interest journalism, covering crypto advancements and institutional changes without profit-driven motives.
Unlike much of mainstream media, which can fall into neutrality traps that obscure the real impacts on retail investors, we’re guided by transparency and integrity. We are unafraid to take a stand in the ongoing struggle against fiat banking dominance and in support of the monetary innovation driven by crypto and Web3. Reporting on issues like FTX, Binance, and Ripple, we bring a bold, unfiltered outsider’s view on global financial disruption—free from the constraints of traditional media narratives.
CryptoCaster remains paywall-free, accessible to everyone, thanks to the support of readers like you. Your contributions keep us independent and help ensure that critical information on the crypto landscape reaches all. If you value our work, please consider supporting us with a one-time contribution starting at just $1 in Bitcoin or Ether, or even monthly if you’re able. Scroll down to find our wallet addresses and help keep CryptoCaster independent and thriving.
Thank you for your support,
Kristin Steinbeck
Editor, CryptoCaster
Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2024 Crypto Caster provides information. CryptoCaster.world does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.
Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Metamask or favorite wallet. Send Coin/Token to Addresses Provided Below.
Thank you!
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
CRYPTOCASTER HEATMAP
