US Supreme Court Hears Argument Over Coinbase User Agreement


The decision by the Supreme Court to hear this case marks a significant turning point for businesses that use arbitration provisions.

The US Supreme Court has taken up a case involving Coinbase and its users, focusing on a crucial procedural question of which contract should be arbitrated or judged in order to resolve conflicts.

Stay in the know on crypto by frequently visiting Crypto News Today

Conflicting agreements between the parties—one promoting arbitration and the other courtroom litigation—are the root of this problem, according to a Bloomberg investigation.


Initially, Coinbase imposed arbitration terms to its customers, but a sweepstakes agreement that required California courts to hear disputes created a problem. In response to claims of misleading advertising, clients filed a class-action lawsuit against Coinbase, challenging the company’s customary arbitration procedure.


Lower courts opposed Coinbase’s attempts to advance arbitration. Supported by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a federal judge in California upheld the sweepstakes agreement’s preference for in-court resolution. The company’s attempt to have the matter transferred to arbitration was therefore denied.

CryptoCaster Quick Check:

This judicial hesitancy is in contrast to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court that sided 5–4 with Coinbase in a related case. Subsequently, the court decided to back the business’s attempts to put a stop to consumer claims while it attempted to have conflicts arbitrated.

Follow GappyCoin PreSale on Twitter, and ReCap for information and more.

Coinbase has acted decisively throughout this legal battle. The business has expanded its offerings by giving customers access to other trading choices. Retail clients who meet the eligibility requirements can now trade cryptocurrency futures, using contracts that are more easily accessible and reflect a smaller portion of the value of Ether and Bitcoin.

The decision by the Supreme Court to hear this case marks a significant turning point for businesses that use arbitration provisions. It also emphasizes how the court will still be involved in determining the parameters of what constitutes arbitration and litigation. The decision is expected to have an effect on the creation and implementation of user agreements, especially in the constantly changing field of virtual currency trading.CRYPTOCASTER® - DECENTRALIZED FREEDOM!


e hope you enjoyed this article. Before you move on, we invite you to consider supporting CryptoCaster’s journalism.

Billionaire owners like Elon Musk, Larry Fink (BlackRock), and Jamie Dimon (JP Morgan Chase) often have a strong influence on the hidden agendas surrounding the paradigm shift brought about by cryptocurrency and emerging Web3 technologies. CryptoCaster stands apart. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to please. Our journalism is dedicated to serving the public interest in crypto development and institutional disruptions, not profit motives.

We avoid the pitfall of much U.S. and global media, which often resorts to false equivalence in the name of neutrality and retail consumer protection. While fairness and transparency guide everything we do, we recognize that there is a right and wrong stance in the fight against fiat global banking interests and the monetary reconstruction driven by the emerging crypto ecology.

When we report on issues like the FTX, Binance, and Ripple crises, we’re not afraid to name names and uncover the truth. As a crypto sentinel, we offer a fresh, outsider perspective on global monetary disruption—something often missing from the insular American and European media bubble.

CryptoCaster’s paywall-free journalism is accessible worldwide thanks to our unique reader-supported model. This is made possible by readers like you. Your support keeps us independent, free from outside influence, and accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for news and information.

We are grateful for the ongoing monetary support from our readers. If you haven’t yet considered supporting CryptoCaster, please consider contributing just once from $1 or more in Bitcoin (satoshi) or Ether, or even better, support us monthly with a bit more. Scroll further down this page to find CryptoCaster’s wallet addresses.

Thank you.

Kristin Steinbeck
Editor, CryptoCaster

Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2024 Crypto Caster provides information. does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.

Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Metamask or favorite wallet. Send Coin/Token to Addresses Provided Below.
Thank you!
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
MATIC – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
LITECOIN – ltc1qxsgp5fykl0007hnwgl93zr9vngwd2jxwlddvqt


You may also like