News

US Legislators Move Forward With a Resolution to Involve Banks in Cryptocurrency Custody Services

single-image

The contentious Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121 may be overturned thanks to a vote by the House Financial Services Committee to advance the resolution.

Stay in the know on crypto by frequently visiting Crypto News Today

In support of a resolution to reverse an SEC guideline that has barred banks from participating in cryptocurrency custody, the House Financial Services Committee (HSFC) cast a vote.

CryptoCaster Quick Check:

Twenty HSFC members voted against the resolution, while 31 members from both political parties supported it during a markup hearing on February 29.

Advertisement

The House Financial Services Committee said in a statement that “by overturning SAB 121, the Resolution will ensure consumer protection by removing roadblocks that prevent highly regulated banks from acting as custodians of digital assets.”

Introduced in March 2022, the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121 is a set of guidelines mandating that institutions holding cryptocurrency assets record those holdings as liabilities on their balance sheets.

Advertisement

The resolution’s Republican sponsor, Congressman Mike Flood, claimed that because custodial assets—which include securities and digital assets like Bitcoin—are “always considered off-balance sheet,” the SAB 121 is unjust to banks wishing to custody cryptocurrency.

“The ramifications of requiring banks to hold these assets on-balance sheet are pretty significant.”

“The on-balance sheet treatment would affect a bank’s other regulatory obligations like their capital and liquidity requirements if they were to custody digital assets in accordance with SAB 121’s guidelines,” Flood continued.

Flood and Democratic congressman Wiley Nickel introduced the resolution on February 1st, claiming that SAB 121 had “beyond the scope of an accounting bulletin” and had thus turned into a de facto law.

Notably, before SAB 121 is overturned, the resolution must still pass both the House and the Senate full floors.

Republican congressman Tom Emmer, who is friendly to cryptocurrency, claimed during the markup hearing that SAB 121 was an “illegal” illustration of SEC Chairman Char Gary Gensler’s “unrelenting prejudice towards the digital asset ecosystem.”

Advertisement

According to Emmer, SAB 121 added “unnecessary and avoidable” concentration risk to the cryptocurrency market.

Advertisement
Follow GappyCoin PreSale on Twitter, and ReCap for information and more.

“One excellent example are the Bitcoin ETFs. Of the eleven approved ETFs, not a single bank offers custodial services. It’s risky, he continued.

However, one of the lawmakers who voted against the resolution, Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters, called the decision to revoke SAB 121 a “ironic” move from politicians who support cryptocurrencies.

“The resolution before us effectively prevents the SEC staff from providing that clarity around crypto,” the speaker said, “despite the fact that we often hear Republicans and the crypto industry complain about a lack of clarity from the SEC.”

SABs are not legally binding under SEC jurisdiction. Rather, they are a set of voluntary standards that SEC employees use to assist businesses in making sense of how cryptocurrency firms ought to record the assets of their clients.

Unlike other more formal rules, SABs do not require public notice or comment periods.CRYPTOCASTER® - DECENTRALIZED FREEDOM!


We hope you found this article insightful. Before you go, please consider supporting CryptoCaster’s independent journalism.

In the world of media owned by billionaires like Elon Musk, Larry Fink (BlackRock), and Jamie Dimon (JP Morgan Chase), influence over narratives surrounding cryptocurrency and Web3 often reflects their interests. CryptoCaster is different. With no billionaire backers or shareholder obligations, we are committed solely to public interest journalism, covering crypto advancements and institutional changes without profit-driven motives.

Unlike much of mainstream media, which can fall into neutrality traps that obscure the real impacts on retail investors, we’re guided by transparency and integrity. We are unafraid to take a stand in the ongoing struggle against fiat banking dominance and in support of the monetary innovation driven by crypto and Web3. Reporting on issues like FTX, Binance, and Ripple, we bring a bold, unfiltered outsider’s view on global financial disruption—free from the constraints of traditional media narratives.

CryptoCaster remains paywall-free, accessible to everyone, thanks to the support of readers like you. Your contributions keep us independent and help ensure that critical information on the crypto landscape reaches all. If you value our work, please consider supporting us with a one-time contribution starting at just $1 in Bitcoin or Ether, or even monthly if you’re able. Scroll down to find our wallet addresses and help keep CryptoCaster independent and thriving.

Thank you for your support,

Kristin Steinbeck
Editor, CryptoCaster


Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2024 Crypto Caster provides information. CryptoCaster.world does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.


Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Metamask or favorite wallet. Send Coin/Token to Addresses Provided Below.
Thank you!
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
SOL – DLvdMu85dW6pZMhw2E4S3pp81qQQGpy5UcdTsFEFBu4b
LITECOIN – ltc1qxsgp5fykl0007hnwgl93zr9vngwd2jxwlddvqt


CRYPTOCASTER HEATMAP


You may also like