- ConsenSys has pushed the SEC to approve the creation of a spot Ethereum ETF.
- Ethereum’s PoS system, according to ConsenSys, provides better security than Bitcoin’s PoW mechanism.
- Ethereum has better security than Bitcoin ETFs that have already received approval, according to ConsenSys.
Stay in the know on crypto by frequently visiting Crypto News Today
A new chapter has been added to the ongoing tale of cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the US. The firm that created the well-known cryptocurrency wallet MetaMask, ConsenSys, has written to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting permission to launch a spot Ethereum ETF.
The Security Measures of Ethereum Under Scrutiny for ETF Adoption
This action is a reaction to the SEC’s earlier March request for public comments. The SEC is especially curious as to whether Ethereum’s novel Proof-of-Stake (PoS) security feature presents any difficulties that might affect an ETF’s ability to remain viable.
ConsenSys contends that the Proof-of-Work (PoW) mechanism of Bitcoin, which is the basis for Bitcoin ETFs that have already received approval, is not as secure as Ethereum’s PoS system. The letter describes how, in comparison to Bitcoin, launching a successful attack on the Ethereum network is much more costly and time-consuming.
CryptoCaster Quick Check:
Visit DailyCoin at https://dailycoin.com/metamasks-parent-company-pushes-sec-for-spot-ethereum-etf/ to learn more. Here, you can also find the source and medium of the article.
ConsenSys estimates that an attack on Ethereum would take almost six months to carry out and cost close to $34.39 billion (based on December 2023 Ether prices). On the other hand, an attack on the Bitcoin network, which is mainly dependent on electricity and processing power, might be much faster and cost anywhere from $5 billion to $20 billion.
Exploring the Benefits of Ethereum’s Proof of Stake System
ConsenSys highlights a number of additional benefits of Ethereum’s PoS system in addition to cost. Faster block finality (transaction confirmation), a decentralized and random validation procedure, and an integrated penalty system for validators who violate network policies are some of these.
ConsenSys claims that these characteristics, along with Ethereum’s open community structure and energy efficiency, produce a strong network that is less prone to fraud and manipulation.
The letter ends with a strong call for the SEC to acknowledge the sophisticated security features incorporated into Ethereum’s architecture. ConsenSys contends that these security measures surpass, not just match, those present in Bitcoin-based ETFs that have previously received commission approval.
ConsenSys’s push is the most recent in the ongoing discussion about cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States. Now that a number of Bitcoin ETFs have been approved, attention is turning to Ethereum and whether or not its unique proof-of-work system will be considered secure enough for an ETF product.
We hope you found this article insightful. Before you go, please consider supporting CryptoCaster’s independent journalism.
In the world of media owned by billionaires like Elon Musk, Larry Fink (BlackRock), and Jamie Dimon (JP Morgan Chase), influence over narratives surrounding cryptocurrency and Web3 often reflects their interests. CryptoCaster is different. With no billionaire backers or shareholder obligations, we are committed solely to public interest journalism, covering crypto advancements and institutional changes without profit-driven motives.
Unlike much of mainstream media, which can fall into neutrality traps that obscure the real impacts on retail investors, we’re guided by transparency and integrity. We are unafraid to take a stand in the ongoing struggle against fiat banking dominance and in support of the monetary innovation driven by crypto and Web3. Reporting on issues like FTX, Binance, and Ripple, we bring a bold, unfiltered outsider’s view on global financial disruption—free from the constraints of traditional media narratives.
CryptoCaster remains paywall-free, accessible to everyone, thanks to the support of readers like you. Your contributions keep us independent and help ensure that critical information on the crypto landscape reaches all. If you value our work, please consider supporting us with a one-time contribution starting at just $1 in Bitcoin or Ether, or even monthly if you’re able. Scroll down to find our wallet addresses and help keep CryptoCaster independent and thriving.
Thank you for your support,
Kristin Steinbeck
Editor, CryptoCaster
Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2024 Crypto Caster provides information. CryptoCaster.world does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.
Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Metamask or favorite wallet. Send Coin/Token to Addresses Provided Below.
Thank you!
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
CRYPTOCASTER HEATMAP
