The court demonstrated an uncommon mastery of DeFi technology and advised the defendants to take their grievances to Congress instead.
Plaintiffs who claimed they lost money as a result of scam tokens on the decentralized cryptocurrency exchange filed a class action lawsuit against Uniswap Labs and its CEO, foundation, and venture capital supporters. The lawsuit was rejected by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Securities and Exchange Commission’s complaint against Coinbase is being heard by the same judge who rendered the dismissing decision, Katherine Polk Failla.
CryptoCaster Quick Check:
Six people who purchased tokens on Uniswap between December 2020 and March 2022 filed the lawsuit. They claimed that Uniswap Labs controlled liquidity pools on the protocol, including those made by the con artists they lost money to, on behalf of a “nationwide class of users”.
April 2022 saw the filing of the lawsuit. Under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the defendants sought the revocation of the (smart) contracts they had signed in order to purchase the fraudulent tokens.
The plaintiffs contended that Uniswap’s conduct supported their claim since it used routers under its control to process protocol transactions, retained “liquidity provider funds and newly created tokens in Uniswap’s
The court stated in her ruling that neither party was aware of the identity of the con artists, and instead of bringing an unlawful solicitation claim against the con artists, the plaintiffs were bringing an online statement claim against the defendants:
“Undaunted, they now sue the Uniswap Defendants and the VC [venture capital] Defendants, hoping that this Court might overlook the fact that the current state of cryptocurrency regulation leaves them without recourse, at least as to the specific claims alleged in this suit.”
The court did not ignore that information:
“The Court declines to stretch the federal securities laws to cover the conduct alleged, and concludes that Plaintiffs’ concerns are better addressed to Congress than to this Court.”
Additionally, the judge made general remarks. over the claims made by the plaintiffs over the core and router contracts, she wrote:
“[I]t defies logic that a drafter of computer code underlying a particular software platform could be liable under Section 29(b) [ of the Exchange Act] for a third-party’s misuse of that platform.”
Additionally, the judge made general remarks. The court noted the unsuccessful class action brought against Coinbase in 2022 for unregulated securities sales in her rationale, according to the author of the plaintiffs’ claims about the core and router contracts. The case was thrown out with prejudice, which prevents a retrial.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I was hoping you would consider taking the step of supporting CryptoCaster’s journalism.
From Elon Musk, Larry Fink(BlackRock) to Jamie Dimon(JP Morgan Chase) a number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the hidden agendas’ which eludes the public concerning the paradigm shift juxtaposed by cryptocurrency and web3 emerging technologies. CryptoCaster is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalistic efforts are produced to serve the public interest in crypto development and institutional disruptions – not profit motives.
And we avoid the trap that befalls much U.S. and global media – the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality and retail consumer protection. While fairness and transparency dictates everything we do, we know there is a right and a wrong position in the fight against fiat global banking interest and monetary reconstruction precipitated by the emerging crypto ecology.
When we report on issues like the FTX, Binance and Ripple crisis, we’re not afraid to name who or what is uncovered. And as a crypto sentinel, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective on the global monetary disruption – one so often missing from the insular American and European media bubble.
Around the world, readers can access the CryptoCaster’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone – whether they can afford to pay for news and information, or not.
We thankyou for the on-going support our readers have bestowed monetarily. If you have not considered supporting CryptoCaster, if you can, please consider supporting us just once from $1 or more of Bitcoin (satoshi) or Eth, and better yet, support us every month with a little more. Scroll further down this page to obtain CryptoCaster’s wallet addresses.
Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2022-2023 Crypto Caster provides information. CryptoCaster.world does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.
Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Wallet Coin/Token Addresses Below.
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
MATIC – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
LITECOIN – ltc1qxsgp5fykl0007hnwgl93zr9vngwd2jxwlddvqt