Hyperliquid Under Fire: JELLY Token Incident Raises Centralization Concerns
Decentralized exchange Hyperliquid is facing intense scrutiny following its handling of a market manipulation incident involving the JELLY token. The platform’s response has ignited debates about its operational integrity and the true nature of its decentralization.
Stay in the know on crypto by frequently visiting Crypto News Today
The JELLY Token Exploit
On March 26, 2025, a trader exploited Hyperliquid’s liquidation mechanisms by opening substantial leveraged positions on the illiquid JELLY memecoin. The trader deposited $7 million across three accounts, initiating two long positions worth $2.15 million and $1.9 million, and a $4.1 million short position. This strategy led to a 400% surge in JELLY’s price, resulting in the short position being liquidated and absorbed by Hyperliquid’s Liquidity Provider Vault (HLP). The exploiter managed to withdraw approximately $6.26 million in profits before Hyperliquid intervened.
CryptoCaster Quick Check:
Hyperliquid’s Response and Centralization Concerns
In reaction to the exploit, Hyperliquid’s validators decided to delist JELLY perpetual futures, citing “evidence of suspicious market activity.” The platform announced that all users, except for flagged addresses, would be compensated by the Hyper Foundation based on on-chain data. citeturn0search1 This action has sparked criticism regarding the platform’s decentralization claims, as the ability to unilaterally halt trading and delist tokens suggests a level of central control inconsistent with decentralized finance (DeFi) principles.
Industry Reactions and Ethical Debates
Gracy Chen, CEO of cryptocurrency exchange Bitget, labeled Hyperliquid’s handling of the incident as “immature, unethical, and unprofessional,” warning that the platform “may be on track to become FTX 2.0.” citeturn0search2 Critics have also highlighted concerns about Hyperliquid’s operational structure, including mixed vaults that expose users to systemic risk and unrestricted position sizes that open the door to manipulation.
Implications for the DeFi Ecosystem
This incident underscores the challenges decentralized exchanges face in balancing security, user trust, and adherence to DeFi principles. While Hyperliquid’s swift action may have prevented more significant losses, it also raises questions about the extent of central authority exercised within supposedly decentralized platforms. As the DeFi landscape evolves, this event serves as a critical case study in the ongoing debate over decentralization, governance, and ethical responsibility in the cryptocurrency industry.
If this article brought you clarity, insight, or value—support the work that made it possible.
At CryptoCaster, we report on Web3, crypto markets, and institutional finance with no billionaire owners, no shareholders, and no hidden agenda. While mainstream media bends toward Elon Musk, BlackRock, and JPMorgan narratives, we stay focused on what matters: truth, transparency, and the public interest.
We don’t just cover the headlines—we investigate the power structures behind them. From FTX and Ripple to the quiet push for CBDCs, we bring fearless reporting that isn’t filtered by corporate interests.
CryptoCaster is 100% paywall-free. Always has been. To keep it that way, we depend on readers like you.
If you believe independent crypto journalism matters, please contribute—starting at just $1 in Bitcoin or Ether. Wallet addresses are below.
Your support keeps us free, bold, and accountable to no one but you.
Thank you,
Kristin Steinbeck
Editor, CryptoCaster
Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2024 Crypto Caster provides information. CryptoCaster.world does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.
Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Metamask or favorite wallet. Send Coin/Token to Addresses Provided Below.
Thank you!
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
CRYPTOCASTER HEATMAP
