The SEC v. Jarkesy case, in which George Jarkesy claims that his Seventh Amendment rights were infringed, serves as the backdrop for the legal challenge.
CryptoCaster Quick Check:
In order to express their disapproval of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) strategy of conducting internal hearings without the participation of juries, Elon Musk, Mark Cuban, and others jointly filed a joint amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court.
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, who recently rebranded Twitter into X and wields influence and controversy in crypto, and Mark Cuban, a billionaire cryptocurrency investor and proponent of decentralized finance (DeFi), both contend that these administrative proceedings result in different outcomes for people who are facing SEC charges. As a result, this strategy has sparked worries about a potential violation of the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial in the United States Constitution.
Stay in the know on crypto by frequently visiting Crypto News Today
The SEC v. Jarkesy case serves as the backdrop for this legal dispute. George Jarkesy claims that in this particular instance, his rights under the Seventh Amendment were infringed. He contends that these rights are violated by 😒 the SEC’s internal adjudication procedure, which is judged by an administrative law judge chosen by the commission without a jury. As a result, one organization essentially serves as the judge, jury, and enforcer.
According to Musk, Cuban, and other amici curiae, the SEC’s strategy changed between 2013 and 2014. The SEC began handling more cases internally rather than through federal courts, they noticed. After a number of unsuccessful insider trading jury trials, this adjustment was made.
Musk is engaged in his third significant court battle with the finance watchdog. This follows previous lawsuits from 2018 and 2019. In order to obtain Musk’s testimony about his purchase of Twitter, the regulatory body is currently pursuing the involvement of a federal court, with a focus on his public statements about the deal, as revealed in legal records.
The amici curiae, however, continue to hold to their unwavering stance, asserting that choosing administrative proceedings over the option of federal court jurors goes against the SEC’s declared goal. Furthermore, such choices might have a bad effect on investors and the markets that the SEC is devoted to defending.
If this article brought you clarity, insight, or value—support the work that made it possible.
At CryptoCaster, we report on Web3, crypto markets, and institutional finance with no billionaire owners, no shareholders, and no hidden agenda. While mainstream media bends toward Elon Musk, BlackRock, and JPMorgan narratives, we stay focused on what matters: truth, transparency, and the public interest.
We don’t just cover the headlines—we investigate the power structures behind them. From FTX and Ripple to the quiet push for CBDCs, we bring fearless reporting that isn’t filtered by corporate interests.
CryptoCaster is 100% paywall-free. Always has been. To keep it that way, we depend on readers like you.
If you believe independent crypto journalism matters, please contribute—starting at just $1 in Bitcoin or Ether. Wallet addresses are below.
Your support keeps us free, bold, and accountable to no one but you.
Thank you,
Kristin Steinbeck
Editor, CryptoCaster
Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2024 Crypto Caster provides information. CryptoCaster.world does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.
Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Metamask or favorite wallet. Send Coin/Token to Addresses Provided Below.
Thank you!
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
CRYPTOCASTER HEATMAP
