According to Santiment, USDC and DAI exhibit a higher degree of decentralization in their holdings, as the leading wallets possess less than 25% of their respective market capitalizations.
Stay in the know on crypto by frequently visiting Crypto News Today
A significant degree of centralization may result in a heightened dominance of a limited number of entities, which could compromise the decentralized principles that cryptocurrencies aim to maintain. Nevertheless, centralization remains a contentious issue within the cryptocurrency landscape.
CryptoCaster Quick Check:
Consequently, well-known project tokens such as Polygon (MATIC) and Shiba Inu (SHIB) have surfaced as prominent instances of substantial concentration of holdings within the top wallets.
Centralization Concerns Surround MATIC and SHIB
Data provided by Santiment reveals that the top ten wallets of Polygon command an impressive 69.4% of its overall market capitalization, positioning it as the most centralized asset among prominent altcoins. In a similar vein, Shiba Inu’s leading ten wallets account for 61.2% of its market cap.
This notable concentration of holdings prompts essential inquiries regarding the implications for market stability and governance of these popular assets. Such concentration may heighten risks related to price manipulation and volatility, as significant holders possess the ability to influence market conditions more profoundly than smaller investors.
In addition, Uniswap (UNI) demonstrates that 50.8% of its total market capitalization is concentrated within its top ten wallets, highlighting a considerable concentration of influence among a limited number of holders. Following closely is the Pepe (PEPE) meme coin, with 46.1% of its supply held by the top wallets.
Ethereum (ETH) continues to experience significant adoption and strives for decentralized governance; however, a substantial 44.0% of its market capitalization remains concentrated within the largest wallets. This concentration is largely attributed to the staking activities associated with the ETH 2.0 contract, which results in a centralization of considerable Ether holdings.
Tether (USDT), recognized as the leading stablecoin, has 33.1% of its total supply controlled by a limited number of wallets. This distribution underscores its extensive acceptance among institutional investors, while simultaneously raising concerns regarding potential liquidity challenges should these major holders opt to withdraw large quantities at once.
Moderate Centralization Detected in LINK and TON
Chainlink (LINK) and Toncoin (TON) demonstrate relatively lower levels of concentration, with 31.1% and 27.5% of their market capitalizations held by the top ten wallets, respectively. In the case of Chainlink, this concentration is indicative of the requirement for substantial holdings by nodes to maintain network security, whereas Toncoin’s distribution is influenced by its recent expansion phase, according to insights from Santiment.
Conversely, stablecoins such as Circle’s USDC and Multi Collateral Dai (DAI) reflect a more decentralized distribution of holdings, with the top ten wallets possessing only 19% and 24.5% of their market capitalizations, respectively.
W
e hope you enjoyed this article. Before you move on, we invite you to consider supporting CryptoCaster’s journalism.
Billionaire owners like Elon Musk, Larry Fink (BlackRock), and Jamie Dimon (JP Morgan Chase) often have a strong influence on the hidden agendas surrounding the paradigm shift brought about by cryptocurrency and emerging Web3 technologies. CryptoCaster stands apart. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to please. Our journalism is dedicated to serving the public interest in crypto development and institutional disruptions, not profit motives.
We avoid the pitfall of much U.S. and global media, which often resorts to false equivalence in the name of neutrality and retail consumer protection. While fairness and transparency guide everything we do, we recognize that there is a right and wrong stance in the fight against fiat global banking interests and the monetary reconstruction driven by the emerging crypto ecology.
When we report on issues like the FTX, Binance, and Ripple crises, we’re not afraid to name names and uncover the truth. As a crypto sentinel, we offer a fresh, outsider perspective on global monetary disruption—something often missing from the insular American and European media bubble.
CryptoCaster’s paywall-free journalism is accessible worldwide thanks to our unique reader-supported model. This is made possible by readers like you. Your support keeps us independent, free from outside influence, and accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for news and information.
We are grateful for the ongoing monetary support from our readers. If you haven’t yet considered supporting CryptoCaster, please consider contributing just once from $1 or more in Bitcoin (satoshi) or Ether, or even better, support us monthly with a bit more. Scroll further down this page to find CryptoCaster’s wallet addresses.
Thank you.
Kristin Steinbeck
Editor, CryptoCaster
Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2024 Crypto Caster provides information. CryptoCaster.world does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.
Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Metamask or favorite wallet. Send Coin/Token to Addresses Provided Below.
Thank you!
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
SOL – DLvdMu85dW6pZMhw2E4S3pp81qQQGpy5UcdTsFEFBu4b
LITECOIN – ltc1qxsgp5fykl0007hnwgl93zr9vngwd2jxwlddvqt
CRYPTOCASTER HEATMAP
