The Washington DC-based blockchain advocacy group contended that the IRS broker rule provisions violate the Paperwork Reduction Act.
The Blockchain Association, an industry advocacy group based in Washington DC, has once again raised objections to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)’s proposed broker-dealer rules. This time, their focus is on the undue burden these rules would impose on investors, cryptocurrency companies, and the IRS itself¹. In their letter, the Association cited the Paperwork Reduction Act, which emphasizes that government regulators should not burden individuals and entities in the financial system with unnecessary and obtuse paperwork requirements.
According to the figures outlined in their letter, signing these proposed rules into law would result in 8 billion 1099-DA tax forms that must be processed, 4 billion hours wasted in labor to process the forms, and an annual compliance cost of $254 billion. These hefty costs and labor burdens significantly differ from earlier IRS projections, which estimated that the new regulations would take only 0.15 hours per customer to complete, with a total compliance cost of $136,350,000.
The Blockchain Association also highlighted that imposing annual compliance costs of $245 billion is unreasonable for an asset class and markets that produce, at most, a tax gap of $10 billion. Their objections stem from concerns about government overreach and the difficulties of imposing reporting requirements on decentralized networks and their participants. The crypto community has echoed these concerns, emphasizing the need for more practical and informed regulations in this rapidly evolving space.
The industry advocacy group explained that certain companies inside the blockchain ecosystem, notably decentralized finance protocols, would have a difficult time, at best, complying with these laws, characterizing the Internal Revenue Service’s proposed broker reporting rule as government overreach.
The Blockchain Association’s initial letter of objection
In the end, the letter exposed “fundamental misunderstandings” held by American government officials regarding digital assets, cryptocurrencies, and decentralized finance. These authorities find it difficult to comprehend the paradigm change that blockchain technology brings about.
The Blockchain Association wrote the IRS a 39-page letter in 2023 with a long list of concerns about the agency’s proposed broker regulations.
The industry advocacy group explained that certain companies inside the blockchain ecosystem, notably decentralized finance protocols, would have a difficult time, at best, complying with these laws, characterizing the Internal Revenue Service’s proposed broker reporting rule as government overreach.
In the end, the letter exposed “fundamental misunderstandings” held by American government officials regarding digital assets, cryptocurrencies, and decentralized finance. These authorities find it difficult to comprehend the paradigm change that blockchain technology brings about.
Widely unpopular within the crypto community
The cryptocurrency community has responded negatively to the Internal Revenue Service’s proposed tax regulations and reporting requirements. Numerous people and organizations have expressed their disapproval of the outdated mandates.
Jerry Brito, executive director of Coin Center, echoed the concerns raised in the Blockchain Association’s initial letter by pointing out the practical challenges of putting these reporting obligations on decentralized networks and their users.
We hope you found this article insightful. Before you go, please consider supporting CryptoCaster’s independent journalism.
In the world of media owned by billionaires like Elon Musk, Larry Fink (BlackRock), and Jamie Dimon (JP Morgan Chase), influence over narratives surrounding cryptocurrency and Web3 often reflects their interests. CryptoCaster is different. With no billionaire backers or shareholder obligations, we are committed solely to public interest journalism, covering crypto advancements and institutional changes without profit-driven motives.
Unlike much of mainstream media, which can fall into neutrality traps that obscure the real impacts on retail investors, we’re guided by transparency and integrity. We are unafraid to take a stand in the ongoing struggle against fiat banking dominance and in support of the monetary innovation driven by crypto and Web3. Reporting on issues like FTX, Binance, and Ripple, we bring a bold, unfiltered outsider’s view on global financial disruption—free from the constraints of traditional media narratives.
CryptoCaster remains paywall-free, accessible to everyone, thanks to the support of readers like you. Your contributions keep us independent and help ensure that critical information on the crypto landscape reaches all. If you value our work, please consider supporting us with a one-time contribution starting at just $1 in Bitcoin or Ether, or even monthly if you’re able. Scroll down to find our wallet addresses and help keep CryptoCaster independent and thriving.
Thank you for your support,
Kristin Steinbeck
Editor, CryptoCaster
Please Read Essential Disclaimer Information Here.
© 2024 Crypto Caster provides information. CryptoCaster.world does not provide investment advice. Do your research before taking a market position on the purchase of cryptocurrency and other asset classes. Past performance of any asset is not indicative of future results. All rights reserved.
Contribute to CryptoCaster℠ Via Metamask or favorite wallet. Send Coin/Token to Addresses Provided Below.
Thank you!
BTC – bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
ETH – 0x7D8D76E60bFF59c5295Aa1b39D651f6735D6413D
CRYPTOCASTER HEATMAP
